This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
E610/7 occurs in a calculation
20-05-2016, 11:06 AM,
#2
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation
Thanks for your background information, we are already looking into the modeling of thick-walled pipelines. We are also looking for ways to (correctly) taking stiffening rings into account. Ticket no. J-1885 has been assigned to this issue.

For now, we will keep the hard limit of D/t < 5 (in design function 6), as we feel that the calculated results with a lower D/t do not match reality at all. So we want to stay on the safe side of things.

So for stiffening rings you have to obey the limit for now. If you feel your rings aren't stiff enough with that ratio, try modeling these a bit different by either using wider rings or by locally changing the material parameters to a stiffer material.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by shaswin - 02-05-2016, 04:29 PM
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by Dr. J Foerster - 20-05-2016, 11:06 AM
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by shaswin - 09-08-2016, 10:51 AM
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by shaswin - 26-08-2016, 08:14 PM
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by shaswin - 18-10-2017, 12:03 PM
RE: E610/7 occurs in a calculation - by shaswin - 06-11-2017, 12:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)