This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Membrane stresses check might not be correct in Ple4Win
10-05-2016, 12:25 PM,
RE: Membrane stresses check might not be correct in Ple4Win
It is true that the reference in table 3 of NEN 3650-2:2012 for "paalfundatie" is not correct: it should be D.3.1.3 indeed.
In the limit value in table 3 Re is applied, whereas in D.3.1.3 ReT is used. This is not consistent. However, the question is: what is correct?

D.3.1.3 deals with mainly primary membrane stresses caused by a combination of BC2 and BC3, so without a temperature load being a secondary load. Is it obvious that for a load case without temperature the ReT as a criterion is used? A question for the NEN committee.

In Ple4Win the Re is used in case of a load combination without temperature. If a temperature load is present, the Sv:pm/Re is not reported, because then it is not a matter of primary loads only.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Membrane stresses check might not be correct in Ple4Win - by ir KW Radder - 10-05-2016, 12:25 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)